References : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants [2]
Ong JL, Carnes DL, Cardenas HL, Cavin R. Surface roughness of titanium on bone morphogenetic protein-2 treated osteoblast cells in vitro. Implant Dent. 1997;6(1):19–24.
Schwartz Z, Kieswetter K, Dean DD, Boyan BD. Underlying mechanisms at the bone-surface interface during regeneration. J Periodontal Res. 1997;32(1 Pt 2):166–71.
Al-Nawas B, Gotz H. Three-dimensional topographic and metrologic evaluation of dental implants by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003;5(3):176–83.
Schweiger M. Zirkoniumdioxid–hochfeste und bruchzähe Strukturkeramik. Ästhetische Zahnmedizin. 2004;5:248–57.
Osman R, Swain M. A critical review of dental implant materials with an emphasis on titanium versus zirconia. Materials. 2015;8(3):932.
Javed F, Al-Hezaimi K, Almas K, Romanos GE. Is titanium sensitivity associated with allergic reactions in patients with dental implants? A systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013;15(1):47–52.
Wennerberg A, Hallgren C, Johansson C, Danelli S. A histomorphometric evaluation of screw-shaped implants each prepared with two surface roughnesses. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1998;9(1):11–9.
Osman RB, Ma S, Duncan W, De Silva RK, Siddiqi A, Swain MV. Fractured zirconia implants and related implant designs: scanning electron microscopy analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24(5):592–7.
Fischer J, Schott A, Martin S. Surface micro-structuring of zirconia dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27(2):162–6.
Bachle M, Butz F, Hubner U, Bakalinis E, Kohal RJ. Behavior of CAL72 osteoblast-like cells cultured on zirconia ceramics with different surface topographies. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18(1):53–9.
Gahlert M, Rohling S, Wieland M, Eichhorn S, Kuchenhoff H, Kniha H. A comparison study of the osseointegration of zirconia and titanium dental implants. A biomechanical evaluation in the maxilla of pigs. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010;12(4):297–305.
Chevalier J, Grandjean S, Kuntz M, Pezzotti G. On the kinetics and impact of tetragonal to monoclinic transformation in an alumina/zirconia composite for arthroplasty applications. Biomaterials. 2009;30(29):5279–82.
Guazzato M, Quach L, Albakry M, Swain MV. Influence of surface and heat treatments on the flexural strength of Y-TZP dental ceramic. J Dent. 2005;33(1):9–18.
Serial posts:
- Abstract : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants
- Background : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants
- Methods : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants [1]
- Methods : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants [2]
- Methods : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants [3]
- Results : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants [2]
- Discussion : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants [1]
- Discussion : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants [2]
- Discussion : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants [3]
- Conclusions : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants
- Abbreviations : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants
- References : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants [1]
- References : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants [2]
- References : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants [3]
- Author information : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants
- Ethics declarations : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants
- Rights and permissions : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants
- About this article : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants
- Table 1 Five commercially available ceramic implants and surface characteristics : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants
- Table 2 EDX : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants
- Table 3 Roughness analysis : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants
- Fig. 1. Diagram of different implant areas used for sampling. 1) Machined (untreated) area. 2) rough (treated) area : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implant
- Fig. 2. SEM. White arrow (→) exemplary mark the droplet like shape of surface as described in the text : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implant
- Fig. 3. SEM for localization of EDX analysis : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implant
- Fig. 4. CLSM : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implant
- Fig. 5. 3D profile : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implant
- Fig. 6. Roughness (Sa) box plot : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implant