References : Prospective multicenter non-randomized controlled study on intraosseous stability and healing period for dental implants in the posterior region [4]
Nedir R, Bischof M, Szmukler-Moncler S, Bernard JP, Samson J. Predicting osseointegration by means of implant primary stability. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15(5):520–8.
Ito Y, Sato D, Yoneda S, Ito D, Kondo H, Kasugai S. Relevance of resonance frequency analysis to evaluate dental implant stability: simulation and histomorphometrical animal experiments. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19(1):9–14. Epub 2007 Nov 6
Boronat-López A, Peñarrocha-Diago M, Martínez-Cortissoz O, Mínguez-Martínez I. Resonance frequency analysis after the placement of 133 dental implants. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2006;11(3):E272–6.
Rowan M, Lee D, Pi-Anfruns J, Shiffler P, Aghaloo T, Moy PK. Mechanical versus biological stability of immediate and delayed implant placement using resonance frequency analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;73(2):253–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2014.09.024. Epub 2014 Oct 13
Brånemark R, Ohrnell LO, Skalak R, Carlsson L, Brånemark PI. Biomechanical characterization of osseointegration: an experimental in vivo investigation in the beagle dog. J Orthop Res. 1998;16(1):61–9.
Held U, Rohner D, Rothamel D. Early loading of hydrophilic titanium implants inserted in low-mineralized (D3 and D4) bone: one year results of a prospective clinical trial. Head Face Med. 2013;9:37. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-9-37.
Lozano-Carrascal N, Salomó-Coll O, Gilabert-Cerdà M, Farré-Pagés N, Gargallo-Albiol J, Hernández-Alfaro F. Effect of implant macro-design on primary stability: a prospective clinical study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2016;21(2):e214–21.
Isoda K, Ayukawa Y, Tsukiyama Y, Sogo M, Matsushita Y, Koyano K. Relationship between the bone density estimated by cone-beam computed tomography and the primary stability of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(7):832–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02203.x. Epub 2011 May 5
Nomura Y, Watanabe H, Honda E, Kurabayashi T. Reliability of voxel values from cone-beam computed tomography for dental use in evaluating bone mineral density. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21(5):558–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01896.x.
Misch CE, editor. Dental implant prosthetics. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2004.
Serial posts:
- Abstract : Prospective multicenter non-randomized controlled study on intraosseous stability and healing period for dental implants in the posterior region
- Background : Prospective multicenter non-randomized controlled study on intraosseous stability and healing period for dental implants in the posterior region [1]
- Background : Prospective multicenter non-randomized controlled study on intraosseous stability and healing period for dental implants in the posterior region [2]
- Methods : Prospective multicenter non-randomized controlled study on intraosseous stability and healing period for dental implants in the posterior region [1]
- Methods : Prospective multicenter non-randomized controlled study on intraosseous stability and healing period for dental implants in the posterior region [2]
- Methods : Prospective multicenter non-randomized controlled study on intraosseous stability and healing period for dental implants in the posterior region [3]
- Results : Prospective multicenter non-randomized controlled study on intraosseous stability and healing period for dental implants in the posterior region [1]
- Results : Prospective multicenter non-randomized controlled study on intraosseous stability and healing period for dental implants in the posterior region [2]
- Discussion : Prospective multicenter non-randomized controlled study on intraosseous stability and healing period for dental implants in the posterior region [1]
- Discussion : Prospective multicenter non-randomized controlled study on intraosseous stability and healing period for dental implants in the posterior region [2]
- Discussion : Prospective multicenter non-randomized controlled study on intraosseous stability and healing period for dental implants in the posterior region [3]
- Discussion : Prospective multicenter non-randomized controlled study on intraosseous stability and healing period for dental implants in the posterior region [4]
- Discussion : Prospective multicenter non-randomized controlled study on intraosseous stability and healing period for dental implants in the posterior region [5]
- Conclusions : Prospective multicenter non-randomized controlled study on intraosseous stability and healing period for dental implants in the posterior region
- Abbreviations : Prospective multicenter non-randomized controlled study on intraosseous stability and healing period for dental implants in the posterior region
- References : Prospective multicenter non-randomized controlled study on intraosseous stability and healing period for dental implants in the posterior region [1]
- References : Prospective multicenter non-randomized controlled study on intraosseous stability and healing period for dental implants in the posterior region [2]
- References : Prospective multicenter non-randomized controlled study on intraosseous stability and healing period for dental implants in the posterior region [3]
- References : Prospective multicenter non-randomized controlled study on intraosseous stability and healing period for dental implants in the posterior region [4]
- Author information : Prospective multicenter non-randomized controlled study on intraosseous stability and healing period for dental implants in the posterior region [1]
- Author information : Prospective multicenter non-randomized controlled study on intraosseous stability and healing period for dental implants in the posterior region [2]
- Ethics declarations : Prospective multicenter non-randomized controlled study on intraosseous stability and healing period for dental implants in the posterior region
- Rights and permissions : Prospective multicenter non-randomized controlled study on intraosseous stability and healing period for dental implants in the posterior region
- About this article : Prospective multicenter non-randomized controlled study on intraosseous stability and healing period for dental implants in the posterior region
- Table 1 Treatment area and size of implant body : Prospective multicenter non-randomized controlled study on intraosseous stability and healing period for dental implants in the posterior region
- Table 2 Result of IT and ISQ : Prospective multicenter non-randomized controlled study on intraosseous stability and healing period for dental implants in the posterior region
- Fig. 1. Genesio® Plus implant with Aanchor surface. Scheme of the dental implant body for the Genesio® Plus implants with Aanchor surface used. a Overview picture of Genesio® Plus implants with Aanchor surface. b Image from scanning electron microscopy. Both pictures were provided by GC Corporation. To obtain osseointegration from an early stage, the dental implant body was treated with sandblasting and acid etching from the neck to apex : Prospective multicenter non-randomized controlled study on intraosseous stability and healing period for dental implant
- Fig. 2. The measurement of the voxel values. A case of bone quality diagnosis before treatment. Width and height of the bone were measured to select the proper size of the implant body. The selected implant body was simulated on the bone images as a symbol, and then the voxel value was calculated as described in the “Methods” section : Prospective multicenter non-randomized controlled study on intraosseous stability and healing period for dental implant
- Fig. 3. The evaluation of the average ISQ. Time-lapse migration of average ISQ. Average ISQ of all specimens increased in a time-dependent manner (results indicated by a line). A significant difference was observed by 6 weeks after surgery : Prospective multicenter non-randomized controlled study on intraosseous stability and healing period for dental implant
- Fig. 4. The classification of the insertion torque. All specimens classified into three groups according to insertion torque. Criteria for the classification are shown in the figure and in the “Methods” section : Prospective multicenter non-randomized controlled study on intraosseous stability and healing period for dental implant
- Fig. 5. The comparison of ISQ values by the insertion torque. Time-lapse migration of ISQ values was compared with IT groups. Each IT group displayed similar migration. A significant difference in The ISQ was found in the low IT group after 8 weeks : Prospective multicenter non-randomized controlled study on intraosseous stability and healing period for dental implant
- Fig. 6. The relationship between ISQ and insertion torque. Percentage of specimens showing ISQ ≥ 73 compared with groups by week. In all groups, a period of rapidly increasing percentages was observed (8–12 weeks in the low IT group, 4–6 weeks in the medium and high IT groups). In the medium and high IT Group, a statistically significant difference was observed between ISQ ≥ 73 and ISQ < 72 (P < 0.05) : Prospective multicenter non-randomized controlled study on intraosseous stability and healing period for dental implant
- Fig. 7. The average voxel value between the maxilla and mandible. There was no difference between the maxilla (430.9 ± 211.6) and the mandible (475.6 ± 211.5) in the average voxel value. Also, no difference was found in each part : Prospective multicenter non-randomized controlled study on intraosseous stability and healing period for dental implant
- Fig. 8. The relationship between average voxel value and insertion torque (averaged over the entire treatment area). The comparison of average voxel value among IT groups. Average voxel value was 384.0 ± 154.6 in the low IT group, 387.7 ± 147.7 in the medium IT group, and 619.2 ± 200.4 in the high IT group : Prospective multicenter non-randomized controlled study on intraosseous stability and healing period for dental implant
- Fig. 9. The comparison of two groups at average voxel values for each part. The comparison of voxel values by insertion torque. All specimens were classified into two groups by insertion torque < 40 and ≥ 40. The < 40 group represents a combination of the low and medium IT groups : Prospective multicenter non-randomized controlled study on intraosseous stability and healing period for dental implant