References : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study [1]
Albrektsson T, Brånemark PI, Hansson HA, et al. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand. 1981;52(2):155–70.
Molly L. Bone density and primary stability in implant therapy. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;2:124–35.
Chong L, Khocht A, Suzuki JB, et al. Effect of implant design on initial stability of tapered implants. J Oral Implantol. 2009;35:130–5.
Falco A, Berardini M, Trisi P. Correlation Between Implant Geometry, Implant Surface, Insertion Torque, and Primary Stability: In Vitro Biomechanical Analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018;33:824–30.
Javed F, Romanos GE. The role of primary stability for successful immediate loading of dental implants. A literature review. J Dent. 2010;38:612–20.
Marquezan M, Osório A, Sant'Anna E, et al. Does bone mineral density influence the primary stability of dental implants? A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23:767–74.
Valente ML, de Castro DT, Shimano AC, et al. Analyzing the Influence of a New Dental Implant Design on Primary Stability. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016;18:168–73.
Trisi P, Berardini M, Falco A, et al. Insufficient irrigation induces peri-implant bone resorption: an in vivo histologic analysis in sheep. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25:696–701.
Aghvami M, Brunski JB, Serdar Tulu U, et al. A Thermal and Biological Analysis of Bone Drilling. J Biomech Eng. 2018;1:140.
Tabassum A, Walboomers XF, Wolke JG, et al. Bone particles and the undersized surgical technique. J Dent Res. 2010;89:581–6.
Turkyilmaz I, Aksoy U, McGlumphy EA. Two alternative surgical techniques for enhancing primary implant stability in the posterior maxilla: a clinical study including bone density, insertion torque, and resonance frequency analysis data. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2008;10:231–7.
Degidi M, Daprile G. Piattelli A Influence of underpreparation on primary stability of implants inserted in poor quality bone sites: an in vitro study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;73:1084–8.
Summers RB. A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: the osteotome technique. Compendium. 1994;15:152–62.
Serial posts:
- Abstract : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study
- Introduction : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study [1]
- Introduction : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study [2]
- Materials and methods : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study [1]
- Materials and methods : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study [2]
- Materials and methods : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study [3]
- Results : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study
- Discussion : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study [1]
- Discussion : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study [2]
- Conclusions : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study
- Availability of data and materials : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study
- References : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study [1]
- References : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study [2]
- References : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study [3]
- Acknowledgements : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study
- Funding : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study
- Author information : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study
- Ethics declarations : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study
- Additional information : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study
- Rights and permissions : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study
- About this article : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study
- Table 1 Basal bone volume percentage (basal %BV) was compared to %BV around implants after 2 months of healing in both groups. %BV in the test group was significantly higher than basal %BV (P < 0.05)
- Table 2 Mean values of histomorphometric parameters (%BIC and %BV) and biomechanical values (VAM, reverse torque, and ISQ) of each implant group : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization
- Table 3 Statistical comparison (T test) of examined parameters between the test and control groups. The histomorphometric analysis demonstrated significant differences in BIC% and %BV values between
- Figure 1. Test group. The implant achieved a high osseointegration degree. The newly formed bone appeared well interconnected with the pre-existing trabeculae. The “corticalization” phenomenon is evident: the bone appears densified around a titanium implant (magnification × 8—toluidine blue) : Single-drill implant
- Figure 2. Test group. Implants in the test group showed an extremely high percentage of bone directly contacted to implant surface (magnification × 25—toluidine blue) : Single-drill implant
- Figure 3. Test group. The present histological photo showed a continuous thin layer of newly formed bone along the neck area of the implant (magnification × 25—toluidine blue) : Single-drill implant
- Figure 4. Control group. No bone condensation was possible with traditional burs and standard implant (magnification × 25—toluidine blue) : Single-drill implant
- Figure 5. Control group. Implants belonging to the control group showed some small surface areas not contacted with bone (magnification × 25—toluidine blue) : Single-drill implant
- Figure 6. Control group. Some implant thread areas were not covered by bone layer (magnification × 25—toluidine blue) : Single-drill implant