Table 1 Basal bone volume percentage (basal %BV) was compared to %BV around implants after 2 months of healing in both groups. %BV in the test group was significantly higher than basal %BV (P < 0.05) : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study
Table 1 Basal bone volume percentage (basal %BV) was compared to %BV around implants after 2 months of healing in both groups. %BV in the test group was significantly higher than basal %BV (P < 0.05)
author: Paolo Trisi, Antonello Falco, Marco Berardini | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
| Basal %BV 26.17 ± 2.35 | Test group | Control group |
|---|---|---|
| 41.83 ± 6.30* | 29.61 ± 5.05 |
Table 1 Basal bone volume percentage (basal %BV) was compared to %BV around implants after 2 months of healing in both groups. %BV in the test group was significantly higher than basal %BV (P < 0.05)
Serial posts:
- Abstract : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study
- Introduction : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study [1]
- Introduction : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study [2]
- Materials and methods : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study [1]
- Materials and methods : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study [2]
- Materials and methods : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study [3]
- Results : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study
- Discussion : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study [1]
- Discussion : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study [2]
- Conclusions : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study
- Availability of data and materials : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study
- References : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study [1]
- References : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study [2]
- References : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study [3]
- Acknowledgements : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study
- Funding : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study
- Author information : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study
- Ethics declarations : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study
- Additional information : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study
- Rights and permissions : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study
- About this article : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study
- Table 1 Basal bone volume percentage (basal %BV) was compared to %BV around implants after 2 months of healing in both groups. %BV in the test group was significantly higher than basal %BV (P < 0.05)
- Table 2 Mean values of histomorphometric parameters (%BIC and %BV) and biomechanical values (VAM, reverse torque, and ISQ) of each implant group : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization
- Table 3 Statistical comparison (T test) of examined parameters between the test and control groups. The histomorphometric analysis demonstrated significant differences in BIC% and %BV values between
- Figure 1. Test group. The implant achieved a high osseointegration degree. The newly formed bone appeared well interconnected with the pre-existing trabeculae. The “corticalization” phenomenon is evident: the bone appears densified around a titanium implant (magnification × 8—toluidine blue) : Single-drill implant
- Figure 2. Test group. Implants in the test group showed an extremely high percentage of bone directly contacted to implant surface (magnification × 25—toluidine blue) : Single-drill implant
- Figure 3. Test group. The present histological photo showed a continuous thin layer of newly formed bone along the neck area of the implant (magnification × 25—toluidine blue) : Single-drill implant
- Figure 4. Control group. No bone condensation was possible with traditional burs and standard implant (magnification × 25—toluidine blue) : Single-drill implant
- Figure 5. Control group. Implants belonging to the control group showed some small surface areas not contacted with bone (magnification × 25—toluidine blue) : Single-drill implant
- Figure 6. Control group. Some implant thread areas were not covered by bone layer (magnification × 25—toluidine blue) : Single-drill implant