Table 2 Mean values of histomorphometric parameters (%BIC and %BV) and biomechanical values (VAM, reverse torque, and ISQ) of each implant group : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study
Table 2 Mean values of histomorphometric parameters (%BIC and %BV) and biomechanical values (VAM, reverse torque, and ISQ) of each implant group : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization
author: Paolo Trisi, Antonello Falco, Marco Berardini | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
| Implant type | BIC% | BV% | Vam (μm) ± SD | Reverse torque (N/cm) ± SD | ISQ value ± SD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test group | 70.91 ± 7.95 | 41.83 ± 6.30 | 82.6 ± 23.27 | 98.2 ± 16.81 | 63.5 ± 1.30 |
| Control group | 49.33 ± 10.73 | 29.61 ± 5.05 | 60.5 ± 16.58 | 98.8 ± 24.40 | 59.4 ± 1.39 |
Table 2 Mean values of histomorphometric parameters (%BIC and %BV) and biomechanical values (VAM, reverse torque, and ISQ) of each implant group
Serial posts:
- Abstract : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study
- Introduction : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study [1]
- Introduction : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study [2]
- Materials and methods : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study [1]
- Materials and methods : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study [2]
- Materials and methods : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study [3]
- Results : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study
- Discussion : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study [1]
- Discussion : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study [2]
- Conclusions : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study
- Availability of data and materials : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study
- References : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study [1]
- References : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study [2]
- References : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study [3]
- Acknowledgements : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study
- Funding : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study
- Author information : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study
- Ethics declarations : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study
- Additional information : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study
- Rights and permissions : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study
- About this article : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study
- Table 1 Basal bone volume percentage (basal %BV) was compared to %BV around implants after 2 months of healing in both groups. %BV in the test group was significantly higher than basal %BV (P < 0.05)
- Table 2 Mean values of histomorphometric parameters (%BIC and %BV) and biomechanical values (VAM, reverse torque, and ISQ) of each implant group : Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization
- Table 3 Statistical comparison (T test) of examined parameters between the test and control groups. The histomorphometric analysis demonstrated significant differences in BIC% and %BV values between
- Figure 1. Test group. The implant achieved a high osseointegration degree. The newly formed bone appeared well interconnected with the pre-existing trabeculae. The “corticalization” phenomenon is evident: the bone appears densified around a titanium implant (magnification × 8—toluidine blue) : Single-drill implant
- Figure 2. Test group. Implants in the test group showed an extremely high percentage of bone directly contacted to implant surface (magnification × 25—toluidine blue) : Single-drill implant
- Figure 3. Test group. The present histological photo showed a continuous thin layer of newly formed bone along the neck area of the implant (magnification × 25—toluidine blue) : Single-drill implant
- Figure 4. Control group. No bone condensation was possible with traditional burs and standard implant (magnification × 25—toluidine blue) : Single-drill implant
- Figure 5. Control group. Implants belonging to the control group showed some small surface areas not contacted with bone (magnification × 25—toluidine blue) : Single-drill implant
- Figure 6. Control group. Some implant thread areas were not covered by bone layer (magnification × 25—toluidine blue) : Single-drill implant