Table 2 Comparison of manual and machine-driven insertion mode
Table 2 Comparison of manual and machine-driven insertion mode
author: Henning Staedt,Peer W Kmmerer,Elisabeth Goetze,Daniel G E Thiem,Bilal Al-Nawas, Diana Heimes | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
| Insertion mode — manual insertion | Insertion mode — machine-driven insertion | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | Mean (SD) | CI | n | Mean (SD) | CI | |
| ISQ | 45 | 68.33 (6.83) | 66.14–70.51 | 45 | 70.25 (5.52) | 68.38–72.12 |
| IT (Ncm) | 45 | 90.56 (31.27) | 80.56–100.56 | 45 | 83.94 (31.81) | 73.17–94.7 |
| TO (Ncm) | 45 | 93.59 (32.3) | 83.27–103.92 | 45 | 89.80 (37.32) | 77.18–102.43 |
ISQ implant stability quotient, IT insertion torque, TO torque out, SD standard deviation, CI confidence interval
Serial posts:
- Implant primary stability depending on protocol and insertion mode — an ex vivo study
- Background : Implant primary stability depending on protocol and insertion mode (1)
- Background : Implant primary stability depending on protocol and insertion mode (2)
- Background : Implant primary stability depending on protocol and insertion mode (3)
- Methods : Implant primary stability depending on protocol and insertion mode (1)
- Methods : Implant primary stability depending on protocol and insertion mode (2)
- Results : Implant primary stability depending on protocol and insertion mode
- Discussion : Implant primary stability depending on protocol and insertion mode (1)
- Discussion : Implant primary stability depending on protocol and insertion mode (2)
- Discussion : Implant primary stability depending on protocol and insertion mode (3)
- Table 1 Comparison of standard and over-dimensioned protocol
- Table 2 Comparison of manual and machine-driven insertion mode
- Table 4 Comparison of implant length
- Table 3 Comparison of implant diameter
- Figure 1. Implant types and drilling protocol
- Figure 2. Over-dimensioned protocol
- Figure 3. Comparison of standard and over-dimensioned protocol