Table 2 Comparison of manual and machine-driven insertion mode
Table 3 Comparison of implant diameter
author: Henning Staedt,Peer W Kmmerer,Elisabeth Goetze,Daniel G E Thiem,Bilal Al-Nawas, Diana Heimes | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
3.3 mm
3.75 mm
4.2 mm
Mean (SD)
CI
Mean (SD)
CI
Mean (SD)
CI
ISQ
66.33 (4.59)
63.79–68.88
69.00 (5.98)
64.72–73.28
69.87 (8.88)
64.94–74.78
IT (Ncm)
102.65 (28.42)
86.91–118.39
90.97 (27.54)
71.27–110.67
78.19 (33.28)
59.76–96.62
TO (Ncm)
94.54 (29.09)
78.43–110.65
81.28 (28.89)
60.67–101.88
100.86 (36.89)
80.43–121.29
ISQ implant stability quotient, IT insertion torque, TO torque out, SD standard deviation, CI confidence interval
Serial posts:
-
Implant primary stability depending on protocol and insertion mode — an ex vivo study
-
Background : Implant primary stability depending on protocol and insertion mode (1)
-
Background : Implant primary stability depending on protocol and insertion mode (2)
-
Background : Implant primary stability depending on protocol and insertion mode (3)
-
Methods : Implant primary stability depending on protocol and insertion mode (1)
-
Methods : Implant primary stability depending on protocol and insertion mode (2)
-
Results : Implant primary stability depending on protocol and insertion mode
-
Discussion : Implant primary stability depending on protocol and insertion mode (1)
-
Discussion : Implant primary stability depending on protocol and insertion mode (2)
-
Discussion : Implant primary stability depending on protocol and insertion mode (3)
-
Table 1 Comparison of standard and over-dimensioned protocol
-
Table 2 Comparison of manual and machine-driven insertion mode
-
Table 4 Comparison of implant length
-
Table 3 Comparison of implant diameter
-
Figure 1. Implant types and drilling protocol
-
Figure 2. Over-dimensioned protocol
-
Figure 3. Comparison of standard and over-dimensioned protocol
| 3.3 mm | 3.75 mm | 4.2 mm | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (SD) | CI | Mean (SD) | CI | Mean (SD) | CI | |
| ISQ | 66.33 (4.59) | 63.79–68.88 | 69.00 (5.98) | 64.72–73.28 | 69.87 (8.88) | 64.94–74.78 |
| IT (Ncm) | 102.65 (28.42) | 86.91–118.39 | 90.97 (27.54) | 71.27–110.67 | 78.19 (33.28) | 59.76–96.62 |
| TO (Ncm) | 94.54 (29.09) | 78.43–110.65 | 81.28 (28.89) | 60.67–101.88 | 100.86 (36.89) | 80.43–121.29 |
ISQ implant stability quotient, IT insertion torque, TO torque out, SD standard deviation, CI confidence interval
- Implant primary stability depending on protocol and insertion mode — an ex vivo study
- Background : Implant primary stability depending on protocol and insertion mode (1)
- Background : Implant primary stability depending on protocol and insertion mode (2)
- Background : Implant primary stability depending on protocol and insertion mode (3)
- Methods : Implant primary stability depending on protocol and insertion mode (1)
- Methods : Implant primary stability depending on protocol and insertion mode (2)
- Results : Implant primary stability depending on protocol and insertion mode
- Discussion : Implant primary stability depending on protocol and insertion mode (1)
- Discussion : Implant primary stability depending on protocol and insertion mode (2)
- Discussion : Implant primary stability depending on protocol and insertion mode (3)
- Table 1 Comparison of standard and over-dimensioned protocol
- Table 2 Comparison of manual and machine-driven insertion mode
- Table 4 Comparison of implant length
- Table 3 Comparison of implant diameter
- Figure 1. Implant types and drilling protocol
- Figure 2. Over-dimensioned protocol
- Figure 3. Comparison of standard and over-dimensioned protocol