Table 2 Comparison of manual and machine-driven insertion mode
Table 3 Comparison of implant diameter
author: Henning Staedt,Peer W Kmmerer,Elisabeth Goetze,Daniel G E Thiem,Bilal Al-Nawas, Diana Heimes | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
| 3.3 mm | 3.75 mm | 4.2 mm | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (SD) | CI | Mean (SD) | CI | Mean (SD) | CI | |
| ISQ | 66.33 (4.59) | 63.79–68.88 | 69.00 (5.98) | 64.72–73.28 | 69.87 (8.88) | 64.94–74.78 |
| IT (Ncm) | 102.65 (28.42) | 86.91–118.39 | 90.97 (27.54) | 71.27–110.67 | 78.19 (33.28) | 59.76–96.62 |
| TO (Ncm) | 94.54 (29.09) | 78.43–110.65 | 81.28 (28.89) | 60.67–101.88 | 100.86 (36.89) | 80.43–121.29 |
ISQ implant stability quotient, IT insertion torque, TO torque out, SD standard deviation, CI confidence interval
Serial posts:
- Implant primary stability depending on protocol and insertion mode — an ex vivo study
- Background : Implant primary stability depending on protocol and insertion mode (1)
- Background : Implant primary stability depending on protocol and insertion mode (2)
- Background : Implant primary stability depending on protocol and insertion mode (3)
- Methods : Implant primary stability depending on protocol and insertion mode (1)
- Methods : Implant primary stability depending on protocol and insertion mode (2)
- Results : Implant primary stability depending on protocol and insertion mode
- Discussion : Implant primary stability depending on protocol and insertion mode (1)
- Discussion : Implant primary stability depending on protocol and insertion mode (2)
- Discussion : Implant primary stability depending on protocol and insertion mode (3)
- Table 1 Comparison of standard and over-dimensioned protocol
- Table 2 Comparison of manual and machine-driven insertion mode
- Table 4 Comparison of implant length
- Table 3 Comparison of implant diameter
- Figure 1. Implant types and drilling protocol
- Figure 2. Over-dimensioned protocol
- Figure 3. Comparison of standard and over-dimensioned protocol