Methods : A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implants: reproducibility and validity of a finite element analysis model [2]
The experimental models were fixed in a micro-CT scanner (inspeXio SMX-90CT, SHIMADZU, Kyoto, Japan) and scanned under the following imaging conditions: tube voltage, 90 kV; tube current, 109 nA; and slice thickness, 100 μm. FEA software (Mechanical Finder®, Research Center of Computational Mechanics, Tokyo, Japan) was used to construct three-dimensional FEA models from the resulting computed tomography (CT) data. The mesh was constructed of tetrahedral elements, and the total numbers of nodes and elements were approximately 270,000 and 1,500,000, respectively. For the Young’s modulus and Poisson ratio of each element, the artificial mandible manufacturer’s publicly disclosed values were used so that they would be similar to the physical properties of the experimental model. They were 628 MPa and 0.3 for artificial cancellous bone, 1,372 MPa and 0.3 for artificial cortical bone, and 100,800 MPa and 0.3 for the implant and superstructure (Table 1). The implant, abutment, and superstructure were assumed to be a continuous structure made of titanium; no intervening conditions were set between the implant and abutment, nor between the abutment and superstructure. The artificial cortical bone, artificial cancellous bone, implant, and superstructure were assumed to be homogeneous, isotropic, and linearly elastic.
To better understand how peri-implant bone is affected by differences in boundary conditions, two different kinds of models were fabricated by changing the boundary conditions between the implant and artificial mandibular bone. One was called a ‘contact model,’ in which the artificial mandible and implant were in complete contact. The coefficient of friction of the interface between the implants and artificial mandibular bones was set to zero. The boundary conditions of the experimental model were reproduced by the contact model of FEA. Immediate loading was assumed in this model, because a state of contact was reproduced between the implant and artificial mandibular bone. The other was called a ‘fixation model,’ in which the artificial mandible and implant were completely bonded together. Delayed loading after the acquisition of osseointegration was assumed in this model. Fixation models were constructed by changing the boundary conditions of the contact model.
Serial posts:
- Abstract : A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implants: reproducibility and validity of a finite element analysis model
- Background : A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implants: reproducibility and validity of a finite element analysis model [1]
- Background : A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implants: reproducibility and validity of a finite element analysis model [2]
- Methods : A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implants: reproducibility and validity of a finite element analysis model [1]
- Methods : A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implants: reproducibility and validity of a finite element analysis model [2]
- Methods : A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implants: reproducibility and validity of a finite element analysis model [3]
- Methods : A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implants: reproducibility and validity of a finite element analysis model [4]
- Results : A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implants: reproducibility and validity of a finite element analysis model [1]
- Results : A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implants: reproducibility and validity of a finite element analysis model [2]
- Results : A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implants: reproducibility and validity of a finite element analysis model [3]
- Discussion : A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implants: reproducibility and validity of a finite element analysis model [1]
- Discussion : A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implants: reproducibility and validity of a finite element analysis model [2]
- Discussion : A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implants: reproducibility and validity of a finite element analysis model [3]
- Discussion : A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implants: reproducibility and validity of a finite element analysis model [4]
- Discussion : A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implants: reproducibility and validity of a finite element analysis model [5]
- Conclusions : A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implants: reproducibility and validity of a finite element analysis model
- Abbreviations : A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implants: reproducibility and validity of a finite element analysis model
- References : A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implants: reproducibility and validity of a finite element analysis model [1]
- References : A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implants: reproducibility and validity of a finite element analysis model [2]
- References : A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implants: reproducibility and validity of a finite element analysis model [3]
- References : A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implants: reproducibility and validity of a finite element analysis model [4]
- Acknowledgements : A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implants: reproducibility and validity of a finite element analysis model
- Author information : A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implants: reproducibility and validity of a finite element analysis model
- Additional information : A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implants: reproducibility and validity of a finite element analysis model
- Rights and permissions : A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implants: reproducibility and validity of a finite element analysis model
- About this article : A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implants: reproducibility and validity of a finite element analysis model
- Table 1 Mechanical properties of the materials used in the FEA : A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implants: reproducibility and validity of a finite element analysis model
- Table 2 Coefficients of variation in implant displacement under loading conditions : A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implants: reproducibility and validity of a finite element analysis model
- Table 3 Three-way ANOVA (displacement in the buccolingual direction [x-axis]) : A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implants: reproducibility and validity of a finite element analysis model
- Table 4 Three-way ANOVA (displacement in the mesiodistal direction [y-axis]) : A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implants: reproducibility and validity of a finite element analysis model
- Table 5 Three-way ANOVA (displacement in the inferior-superior direction [z-axis]) : A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implants: reproducibility and validity of a finite element analysis model
- Table 6 Three-way ANOVA (equivalent stress) : A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implants: reproducibility and validity of a finite element analysis model
- Table 7 Coefficients of variation for equivalent stresses : A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implants: reproducibility and validity of a finite element analysis model
- Figure 1. An artificial mandible. : A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implant
- Figure 2. Three implants were embedded in an artificial mandible. : A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implant
- Figure 3. An experimental model. (a) Buccal loading, (b) central loading, and (c) lingual loading are shown. : A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implant
- Figure 4. An experimental model loading test. : A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implant
- Figure 5. An FEA model. (a) Buccal loading, (b) central loading, and (c) lingual loading are shown. : A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implant
- Figure 6. Implant displacement under loading conditions. : A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implant
- Figure 7. The displacement of the three implants. (M) Mesial side, (D) Distal side, (B) Buccal side, and (L) Lingual side are shown. : A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implant
- Figure 8. Displacement in the buccolingual direction (x-axis). (a) The contact model and (b) the fixation model. : A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implant
- Figure 9. Displacement in the mesiodistal direction (y-axis). (a) The contact model and (b) the fixation model. : A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implant
- Figure 10. Displacement in the inferior-superior direction (z-axis). (a) The contact model and (b) the fixation model. : A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implant
- Figure 11. The distribution of equivalent stress (MPa) around the first molar. : A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implant
- Figure 12. Equivalent stresses at (a) the neck and (b) the tip of the implant. : A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implant