Results : Osseointegration of TI6Al4V dental implants (3)
Table 2 shows the estimated mean values and standard deviations for the BMD in healthy (control) and osteoporotic (OVX) rabbits. The comparison of mean values established significant differences between control and OVX groups (p = 0.006). The BMD results show that the ovariectomy and hypocalcic diet described in (20) resulted being proper methods to have osteoporotic rabbits before the insertion of implants in the tibiae.
After insertion of the implants, BMD of above and below implant areas in tibiae with and without the local application of GH for each rabbit group (control and OVX) was measured at 15 and 30 days. As an example, means (grammes per square centimetre) and standard deviations in control and OVX rabbits after 15 days appear in Table 3.
BMD values indicate that there are no significant statistical differences either above or below the implant areas, in metaphysis and diaphysis regions, independently on the variables studied: type of implant (commercial or modified) and addition of GH local administration in the implantation site.
In general, after 30 days, in OVX group, BMD results show that the modification of the surface by the thermal treatment gives rise to a significant better bone response (p = 0.016) (Fig. 5).
In agreement with the BMD results, the BIC values show no significant statistical differences independently on the local administration of GH in the implantation site and previous oxidation treatment of the implant.
Figure 6 shows the results of BIC values of thermally treated and control implants in OVX rabbits (with and without GH) after 15 and 30 days. We found a small non-significant difference in BIC results in the osteoporotic group affecting the osseointegration response after 15 and 30 days of implantation period, mainly related to the previous thermal treatment applied on the implants. Nevertheless, all ANOVA values were higher than 0.05 so no significant differences were found at any condition at 95 % confidence level.
Serial posts:
- Osseointegration of TI6Al4V dental implants
- Background : Osseointegration of TI6Al4V dental implants
- Methods : Osseointegration of TI6Al4V dental implants (1)
- Methods : Osseointegration of TI6Al4V dental implants (2)
- Methods : Osseointegration of TI6Al4V dental implants (3)
- Methods : Osseointegration of TI6Al4V dental implants (4)
- Methods : Osseointegration of TI6Al4V dental implants (5)
- Results : Osseointegration of TI6Al4V dental implants (1)
- Results : Osseointegration of TI6Al4V dental implants (2)
- Results : Osseointegration of TI6Al4V dental implants (3)
- Discussion : Osseointegration of TI6Al4V dental implants (1)
- Discussion : Osseointegration of TI6Al4V dental implants (2)
- Discussion : Osseointegration of TI6Al4V dental implants (3)
- References : Osseointegration of TI6Al4V dental implants
- Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the classification of experimental animals in groups
- Figure 2. Transcortical osteotomy with Ti6Al4V implant inserted in the tibia bone
- Figure 3. SEM image of the surface of control commercial Ti6Al4V dental implants
- Figure 4. SEM image of the nanoroughness of the oxidized surfaces on control Ti6Al4V dental implants after 700 °C for 1 h
- Figure 6. Bone to implant contact (BIC) values (%) for commercial
- Table 1 Chemical analysis by EDAX of the surface of Ti6Al4V commercial implants
- Table 2 Mean (grammes per square centimetre) and standard deviations
- Table 3 Means and standard deviations of the bone mineral density