Table 1 The materials used in the study
Table 1 The materials used in the study
author: Elif Yein Mustafa Hayati Atala | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
Material
Chemical composition (%)
Coefficient of thermal expansion (10−6 K−1)
Flexural strength (MPa)
Manufacturer
IPS e.max CAD; lithium disilicate glass ceramic (LDS)
SiO2 (57–80), Li2O (11–19), K2O (0–13), P2O5 (0–11), ZrO2 (0–8), ZnO (0–8), Al2O3 (0–5), MgO (0–5), coloring oxides (0–8)
10.2
360
Ivoclar Vivadent
IPS e.max Ceram; low-fusing nano-fluorapatite glass-ceramic
SiO2 (60–65), Al2O3 (8–12), Na2O (6–9), K2O (6–8), ZnO (2–3), CaO, P2O5 ve F (2–6), other oxides (2–8.5), pigments (0.1–1.5)
9.5
90
Ivoclar Vivadent
Vita Suprinity; zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass ceramic
ZrO2 (8–12), SiO2 (56–64), Li2O (15–21), La2O3 (0.1), pigments (< 10), various (> 10)
12.3
420
Vita Zahnfabrik
Vita VM 11; low-fusing feldspar ceramic
SiO2 (62–65), Al2O3 (8.5–12), Na2O (5–7.5), K2O (9–12), CaO (1–2), ZrO2 (< 1), B2O3 (4–6)
11.6
100
Vita Zahnfabrik
Serial posts:
-
Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns with different analyses
-
Background : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns
-
Method : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (1)
-
Method : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (2)
-
Method : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (3)
-
Results : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns
-
Discussion : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (1)
-
Discussion : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (2)
-
Discussion : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (3)
-
Discussion : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (4)
-
Discussion : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (5)
-
Conclusion : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns
-
Table 1 The materials used in the study
-
Table 2 The materials in the groups
-
Figure 1. Crown restoration design
-
Table 3 The properties of the materials used in FEA and the references of these values
-
Table 4 Descriptive statistical analysis of the groups
-
Figure 2. The graph of the interaction of the materials and restoration desig
-
Figure 3. a–d Maximum principal stress distribution on crown restoration.
-
Figure 4. a–d Von Mises stress distribution on implant.
-
Figure 5. a–d Von Mises stress distribution on abutment.
-
Figure 6. Von Mises stress distribution on bone
| Material | Chemical composition (%) | Coefficient of thermal expansion (10−6 K−1) | Flexural strength (MPa) | Manufacturer |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPS e.max CAD; lithium disilicate glass ceramic (LDS) | SiO2 (57–80), Li2O (11–19), K2O (0–13), P2O5 (0–11), ZrO2 (0–8), ZnO (0–8), Al2O3 (0–5), MgO (0–5), coloring oxides (0–8) | 10.2 | 360 | Ivoclar Vivadent |
| IPS e.max Ceram; low-fusing nano-fluorapatite glass-ceramic | SiO2 (60–65), Al2O3 (8–12), Na2O (6–9), K2O (6–8), ZnO (2–3), CaO, P2O5 ve F (2–6), other oxides (2–8.5), pigments (0.1–1.5) | 9.5 | 90 | Ivoclar Vivadent |
| Vita Suprinity; zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass ceramic | ZrO2 (8–12), SiO2 (56–64), Li2O (15–21), La2O3 (0.1), pigments (< 10), various (> 10) | 12.3 | 420 | Vita Zahnfabrik |
| Vita VM 11; low-fusing feldspar ceramic | SiO2 (62–65), Al2O3 (8.5–12), Na2O (5–7.5), K2O (9–12), CaO (1–2), ZrO2 (< 1), B2O3 (4–6) | 11.6 | 100 | Vita Zahnfabrik |
- Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns with different analyses
- Background : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns
- Method : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (1)
- Method : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (2)
- Method : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (3)
- Results : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns
- Discussion : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (1)
- Discussion : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (2)
- Discussion : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (3)
- Discussion : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (4)
- Discussion : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (5)
- Conclusion : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns
- Table 1 The materials used in the study
- Table 2 The materials in the groups
- Figure 1. Crown restoration design
- Table 3 The properties of the materials used in FEA and the references of these values
- Table 4 Descriptive statistical analysis of the groups
- Figure 2. The graph of the interaction of the materials and restoration desig
- Figure 3. a–d Maximum principal stress distribution on crown restoration.
- Figure 4. a–d Von Mises stress distribution on implant.
- Figure 5. a–d Von Mises stress distribution on abutment.
- Figure 6. Von Mises stress distribution on bone