Table 3 The properties of the materials used in FEA and the references of these values
Table 3 The properties of the materials used in FEA and the references of these values
author: Elif Yein Mustafa Hayati Atala | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
Material
Young’s modulus (GPa)
Poisson ratio
Reference
E.max CAD
95
0.20
[1]
Vita Suprinity
65
0.23
[2]
Vita VM 11
65
0.23
*
E.max Ceram
64
0.23
[4]
Implant and abutment
114
0.34
[5]
Cortical bone
13.7
0.3
[5]
Spongious bone
1
0.3
[5]
Serial posts:
-
Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns with different analyses
-
Background : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns
-
Method : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (1)
-
Method : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (2)
-
Method : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (3)
-
Results : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns
-
Discussion : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (1)
-
Discussion : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (2)
-
Discussion : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (3)
-
Discussion : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (4)
-
Discussion : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (5)
-
Conclusion : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns
-
Table 1 The materials used in the study
-
Table 2 The materials in the groups
-
Figure 1. Crown restoration design
-
Table 3 The properties of the materials used in FEA and the references of these values
-
Table 4 Descriptive statistical analysis of the groups
-
Figure 2. The graph of the interaction of the materials and restoration desig
-
Figure 3. a–d Maximum principal stress distribution on crown restoration.
-
Figure 4. a–d Von Mises stress distribution on implant.
-
Figure 5. a–d Von Mises stress distribution on abutment.
-
Figure 6. Von Mises stress distribution on bone
| Material | Young’s modulus (GPa) | Poisson ratio | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| E.max CAD | 95 | 0.20 | [1] |
| Vita Suprinity | 65 | 0.23 | [2] |
| Vita VM 11 | 65 | 0.23 | * |
| E.max Ceram | 64 | 0.23 | [4] |
| Implant and abutment | 114 | 0.34 | [5] |
| Cortical bone | 13.7 | 0.3 | [5] |
| Spongious bone | 1 | 0.3 | [5] |
- Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns with different analyses
- Background : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns
- Method : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (1)
- Method : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (2)
- Method : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (3)
- Results : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns
- Discussion : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (1)
- Discussion : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (2)
- Discussion : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (3)
- Discussion : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (4)
- Discussion : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (5)
- Conclusion : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns
- Table 1 The materials used in the study
- Table 2 The materials in the groups
- Figure 1. Crown restoration design
- Table 3 The properties of the materials used in FEA and the references of these values
- Table 4 Descriptive statistical analysis of the groups
- Figure 2. The graph of the interaction of the materials and restoration desig
- Figure 3. a–d Maximum principal stress distribution on crown restoration.
- Figure 4. a–d Von Mises stress distribution on implant.
- Figure 5. a–d Von Mises stress distribution on abutment.
- Figure 6. Von Mises stress distribution on bone