Table 3 The properties of the materials used in FEA and the references of these values
Table 4 Descriptive statistical analysis of the groups
author: Elif Yein Mustafa Hayati Atala | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
Group
N
Mean (N)
Standard deviation
Minimum
Maximum
L-M
12
2891.88a
410.12
2079.74
3486.96
L-V
12
2077.37bc
356.59
1220.96
2493.39
ZL-M
12
1750.28c
314.96
1084.36
2163.95
ZL-V
12
2202.55b
503.14
1292.20
2912.81
Serial posts:
-
Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns with different analyses
-
Background : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns
-
Method : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (1)
-
Method : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (2)
-
Method : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (3)
-
Results : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns
-
Discussion : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (1)
-
Discussion : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (2)
-
Discussion : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (3)
-
Discussion : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (4)
-
Discussion : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (5)
-
Conclusion : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns
-
Table 1 The materials used in the study
-
Table 2 The materials in the groups
-
Figure 1. Crown restoration design
-
Table 3 The properties of the materials used in FEA and the references of these values
-
Table 4 Descriptive statistical analysis of the groups
-
Figure 2. The graph of the interaction of the materials and restoration desig
-
Figure 3. a–d Maximum principal stress distribution on crown restoration.
-
Figure 4. a–d Von Mises stress distribution on implant.
-
Figure 5. a–d Von Mises stress distribution on abutment.
-
Figure 6. Von Mises stress distribution on bone
| Group | N | Mean (N) | Standard deviation | Minimum | Maximum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L-M | 12 | 2891.88a | 410.12 | 2079.74 | 3486.96 |
| L-V | 12 | 2077.37bc | 356.59 | 1220.96 | 2493.39 |
| ZL-M | 12 | 1750.28c | 314.96 | 1084.36 | 2163.95 |
| ZL-V | 12 | 2202.55b | 503.14 | 1292.20 | 2912.81 |
- Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns with different analyses
- Background : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns
- Method : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (1)
- Method : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (2)
- Method : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (3)
- Results : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns
- Discussion : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (1)
- Discussion : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (2)
- Discussion : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (3)
- Discussion : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (4)
- Discussion : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns (5)
- Conclusion : Comparison of CAD/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns
- Table 1 The materials used in the study
- Table 2 The materials in the groups
- Figure 1. Crown restoration design
- Table 3 The properties of the materials used in FEA and the references of these values
- Table 4 Descriptive statistical analysis of the groups
- Figure 2. The graph of the interaction of the materials and restoration desig
- Figure 3. a–d Maximum principal stress distribution on crown restoration.
- Figure 4. a–d Von Mises stress distribution on implant.
- Figure 5. a–d Von Mises stress distribution on abutment.
- Figure 6. Von Mises stress distribution on bone