Open hour: senin - sabtu 09:00:00 - 20:00:00; minggu & tanggal merah tutup

Figure 6. Cultivation and osteogenic differentiati...

Figure 6. Figure 6. Cultivation and osteogenic differentiation of DFCs on PA after modification with collagen I. (Left) Relative cell number and (Right) normalized ALP activity.

Figure 5. Evaluation of osteogenic differentiation...

Figure 5. resentative results are shown for dNC-PCs. Figure 5. Evaluation of osteogenic differentiation. (A) Clustergram of PCR-array results; (B-C) histology of differentiated dental cells on AP (B) and SB (C). Representative results are shown for dNC-PCs.

Figure 4. Osteogenic differentiation of dental ste...

Figure 4. dishes for control. Figure 4. Osteogenic differentiation of dental stem cells. Normalized ALP activity of dNC-PCs and DFCs on AP and SB (A) and on silicone (B). Cells were differentiated on standard cell culture dishes for control.

Figure 3. Evaluation of programmed cell death (apo...

Figure 3. (black number), apoptotic cells (blue number), and dead cells (red number). (B) Western blot analyses show the expression of the pro-apoptotic marker BAX and the anti-apoptotic marker BCL2. Figure 3. Evaluation of programmed cell death (apoptosis) in dental stem cells. (A) Flow cytometry analyses (for details materials and methods) show percentage of vital cells (black number), apop...

Figure 2. Cell proliferation of dNC-PCs and DFCs o...

Figure 2. spheroid cell clusters on silicone (representative pictures for DFCs); Silicone (24 and 48 h). Figure 2. C ell proliferation of dNC-PCs and DFCs on tested materials. (A) and (B) Relative cell numbers; (C) spheroid cell clusters on silicone (representative pictures for DFCs); Silicone (24 and 48 h).

Figure 1. Cell attachment on tested materials. (A)...

Figure 1. ative pictures of DFCs. Figure 1. Cell attachment on tested materials. (A) Relative cell adherence of DFCs and dNC-PCs; (B) dental cells did little adhere on PA; representative pictures of DFCs.

About this article : Evaluation of implant-materia...

Gosau, M., Viale-Bouroncle, S., Eickhoff, H. et al. Evaluation of implant-materials as cell carriers for dental stem cells under in vitro conditions. Int J Implant Dent 1, 2 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-014-0002-y Download citation Received: 17 September 2014 Accepted: 20 November 2014 Published: 12 February 2015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-014-0002-y

Rights and permissions : Evaluation of implant-mat...

Reprints and Permissions

Additional file : Evaluation of implant-materials ...

DFCs and dNC-PCs expressed typical markers for dental stem cells.

Additional information : Evaluation of implant-mat...

Martin Gosau, Sandra Viale-Bouroncle, Hannah Eickhoff, Esthera Prateeptongkum, Anja Reck, W Götz, Christoph Klingelhöffer, Steffen Müller and Christian Morsczeck declare that they have no competing interests. SVB, HE, and EP carried out all cell biology experiments, performed real-time PCRs, Western blots, and the statistical analysis and made figures for the manuscript. AR carried out and ana...

Author information : Evaluation of implant-materia...

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar Correspondence to Christian Morsczeck.

Author information : Evaluation of implant-materia...

Department of Cranio- and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hospital of the University of Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany Martin Gosau, Sandra Viale-Bouroncle, Hannah Eickhoff, Esthera Prateeptongkum, Anja Reck, Christoph Klingelhöffer, Steffen Müller & Christian Morsczeck Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University Nuernberg, B...

Acknowledgement : Evaluation of implant-materials ...

This study was supported by a grant from the Deutschen Gesellschaft für Implantologie (DGI) e.V.

References : Evaluation of implant-materials as ce...

Marino G, Rosso F, Cafiero G, Tortora C, Moraci M, Barbarisi M, Barbarisi A. Beta-tricalcium phosphate 3D scaffold promote alone osteogenic differentiation of human adipose stem cells: in vitro study. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2010; 21:353–63. Arnold U, Lindenhayn K, Perka C. In vitro-cultivation of human periosteum derived cells in bioresorbable polymer-TCP-composites. Biomaterials. 2002; 23:2303...

References : Evaluation of implant-materials as ce...

Felthaus O, Gosau M, Morsczeck C. ZBTB16 induces osteogenic differentiation marker genes in dental follicle cells independent from RUNX2. J Periodontol. 2014; 85:e144–51. Viale-Bouroncle S, Gosau M, Küpper K, Möhl C, Brockhoff G, Reichert TE, Schmalz G, Ettl T, Morsczeck C. Rigid matrix supports osteogenic differentiation of stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHED). Differ Re...

References : Evaluation of implant-materials as ce...

Kagami H, Agata H, Tojo A. Bone marrow stromal cells (bone marrow-derived multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells) for bone tissue engineering: basic science to clinical translation. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2011; 43:286–89. Robey PG. Cell sources for bone regeneration: the good, the bad, and the ugly (but promising). Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2011; 17:423–30. Morsczeck C, Shi S, Huang G. Stem/...

Conclusions : Evaluation of implant-materials as c...

In conclusion, our work supports our hypothesis that soft implant materials are not suitable for dental tissue engineering. Moreover, our study also supports the results of our previous studies with DFCs and TCP that induction of apoptosis did not impair the proliferation and the differentiation in dental stem cells.

Discussion : Evaluation of implant-materials as ce...

In a previous study, we showed that TCP induced the programmed cell death (apoptosis) in DFCs [11]. Our new study investigated therefore the induction of apoptosis in dental cells. While SB and soft materials did not induce apoptosis or cell death, AP induced obviously cell death and apoptosis in dental cells. Here, the results for dNC-PCs and DFCs were almost the same. Interestingly, neither sili...

Discussion : Evaluation of implant-materials as ce...

Scaffolds play an important role in tissue engineering. However, little is known about the proliferation and differentiation of DFCs and dNC-PCs on different types of materials. As we have learned from previous studies mechanical properties such as surface stiffness are decisive for a successful osteogenic differentiation of dental stem cells [13,14]. Moreover, we showed that bone substitute mater...

Results : Evaluation of implant-materials as cell ...

The soft material PA was also treated with the extracellular matrix protein collagen to improve cell adherence. We tested representatively DFCs with collagen I modified PA. DFCs adhered and proliferated on modified PA, but, however, the specific ALP activity was reduced in comparison to that of DFCs on standard cell culture dishes (Figure 6). This reduction of the specific ALP activity was simila...

Results : Evaluation of implant-materials as cell ...

Dental cells were cultivated in standard cell culture media until passage 6. Cell adherence and cell proliferation/growth were measured for the estimation of cell viability on tested rigid and soft materials. In Figure 1, the cell adherence of dNC-PCs on bone substitute materials was better than that of DFCs. However, both dental cells types adhered very well on silicone. Unluckily, dental cells ...

Methods : Evaluation of implant-materials as cell ...

DFCs were cultivated until sub-confluence (>80%) in standard cell culture medium before the differentiation starts with the osteogenic differentiation medium (ODM) comprised DMEM (PAA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Sigma-Aldrich), 100 μmol/L ascorbic acid 2-phosphate, 10 mmol/L KH2PO4, 1 × 10−8 mol/L dexamethasone sodium phosphate (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), HEPES (20 ...

Methods : Evaluation of implant-materials as cell ...

Numbers of vital cells were evaluated after days 1, 2, 3, and 6. For cell counting, cell cultures were incubated with the cell counting kit 8 (CCK8) ready to use solution according to manufactures instructions (Dojindo, Rockville, MD, USA). The optical density (O.D.) was measured at a wavelength of 450 nm. For the evaluation of the cell adherence (normalized to standard cell culture dishes), cell...

Methods : Evaluation of implant-materials as cell ...

The bone substitutes Maxgraft® (AP) and Maxresorb® (SB) were obtained from the company Botiss (botiss dental GmbH, Berlin, Germany). Maxgraft® is a sterile, high-safety allograft product (AP), derived from human donor bone. It is processed by an audited and certified bone bank (Cells+ Tissue Bank Austria, Berlin, Germany). In contrast, Maxresorb® is a fully synthetic bone graft substitute (SB)...

Methods : Evaluation of implant-materials as cell ...

The isolation and characterization of DFCs and dNC-PCs were described in previous studies [4,7,12]. DFCs were routinely cultivated in DMEM (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and 100 μg/ml penicillin/streptomycin (standard cell culture medium). dNC-PCs were cultivated in DMEM (Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with 15% fetal ...

Background : Evaluation of implant-materials as ce...

Unfortunately, an additional study showed that TCP induced apoptosis in DFCs [11]. However, the induction of apoptosis exposed a risk for cellular therapies. We decided therefore to evaluate additional implant materials for the identification of a suitable scaffold for dental stem cells. Soft materials such as silicone are successfully used in regenerative medicine, and they are suitable for tissu...

Background : Evaluation of implant-materials as ce...

While bone substitute materials are routinely used, especially vertical bone, augmentation of the jaws is still a problematic step. Dental stem cells in combination with bone substitute materials may accelerate the augmentation of alveolar bone and perhaps, stem cell-based therapies can become an alternative to autologous, allogenic, or synthetic bone transplants and substitutes [1,2]. However, sc...

Abstract : Evaluation of implant-materials as cell...

Dental stem cells in combination with implant materials may become an alternative to autologous bone transplants. For tissue engineering different types of soft and rigid implant materials are available, but little is known about the viability and the osteogenic differentiation of dental stem cells on these different types of materials. According to previous studies we proposed that rigid bone sub...

Figure 6. Cultivation and osteogenic differentiati...

Figure 6. Cultivation and osteogenic differentiation of DFCs on PA after modification with collagen I. (Left) Relative cell number and (Right) normalized ALP activity. Figure 6. Cultivation and osteogenic differentiation of DFCs on PA after modification with collagen I. (Left) Relative cell number and (Right) normalized ALP activity.

Figure 5. Evaluation of osteogenic differentiation

Figure 5. Evaluation of osteogenic differentiation. (A) Clustergram of PCR-array results; (B-C) histology of differentiated dental cells on AP (B) and SB (C). Representative results are shown for dNC-PCs. Figure 5. Evaluation of osteogenic differentiation. (A) Clustergram of PCR-array results; (B-C) histology of differentiated dental cells on AP (B) and SB (C). Representative result...

Figure 4. Osteogenic differentiation of dental ste...

Figure 4. Osteogenic differentiation of dental stem cells. Normalized ALP activity of dNC-PCs and DFCs on AP and SB (A) and on silicone (B). Cells were differentiated on standard cell culture dishes for control. Figure 4. Osteogenic differentiation of dental stem cells. Normalized ALP activity of dNC-PCs and DFCs on AP and SB (A) and on silicone (B). Cells were differentiated on standar...

Figure 3. Evaluation of programmed cell death (apo...

  Figure 3. Evaluation of programmed cell death (apoptosis) in dental stem cells. (A) Flow cytometry analyses (for details materials and methods) show percentage of vital cells (black number), apoptotic cells (blue number), and dead cells (red number). (B) Western blot analyses show the expression of the pro-apoptotic marker BAX and the anti-apoptotic marker BCL2.

Figure 2. Cell proliferation of dNC-PCs and DFCs o...

  Figure 2. Cell proliferation of dNC-PCs and DFCs on tested materials. (A) and (B) Relative cell numbers; (C) spheroid cell clusters on silicone (representative pictures for DFCs); Silicone (24 and 48 h).  

Figure 1. Cell attachment on tested materials.

  Figure 1. Cell attachment on tested materials. (A) Relative cell adherence of DFCs and dNC-PCs; (B) dental cells did little adhere on PA; representative pictures of DFCs.

Discussion : Evaluation of implant-materials as ce...

In a previous study, we showed that TCP induced the programmed cell death (apoptosis) in DFCs. Our new study investigated therefore the induction of apoptosis in dental cells. While SB and soft materials did not induce apoptosis or cell death, AP induced obviously cell death and apoptosis in dental cells. Here, the results for dNC-PCs and DFCs were almost the same. Interestingly, neither sil...

Discussion : Evaluation of implant-materials as ce...

Discussion Scaffolds play an important role in tissue engineering. However, little is known about the proliferation and differentiation of DFCs and dNC-PCs on different types of materials. As we have learned from previous studies mechanical properties such as surface stiffness are decisive for a successful osteogenic differentiation of dental stem cells. Moreover, we showed that bone substi...

Results : Evaluation of implant-materials as cell ...

Results Cell viability Dental cells were cultivated in standard cell culture media until passage 6. Cell adherence and cell proliferation/growth were measured for the estimation of cell viability on tested rigid and soft materials. In Figure 1, the cell adherence of dNC-PCs on bone substitute materials was better than that of DFCs. However, both dental cells types adhered very well on silicone...

Methods : Evaluation of implant-materials as cell ...

Cells positive for Caspase3/7 Green Detection Reagent were identified as apoptotic cells, while dead cells were positive for SYTOX® AADvanced dead cell stain. However, vital cells were negatively stained for both staining solutions. Western blotting For protein isolation, cells were treated with lysis buffer (250 μl phosphatase, 100 mM Na3VO4, 137 mM NaCl, 200 mM Tris, 480 mM NaF, 1% NP-4...

Methods : Evaluation of implant-materials as cell ...

This incubation step with the implant material was repeated twice with fresh cell culture media. Three eluates were pooled for cell culture experiments. DFCs were seeded onto cell culture plates and cultivated in standard cell culture media. After cell seeding (12 to 24 h), cell culture media were changed, and cells were cultivated in cell culture media with material eluates. After 24 h of cultiva...

Methods : Evaluation of implant-materials as cell ...

After washing with PBS, the gels were stored in PBS at 4°C. Before platting the cells, the gel was exposed to UV for 15 min for the sterilization and replace PBS with complete culture medium for 1 h at 37°C. Implant materials The bone substitutes Maxgraft® (AP) and Maxresorb® (SB) were obtained from the company Botiss (botiss dental GmbH, Berlin, Germany). Maxgraft® is a sterile, high-saf...

Methods : Evaluation of implant-materials as cell ...

Methods Cell culture The isolation and characterization of DFCs and dNC-PCs were described in previous studies. DFCs were routinely cultivated in DMEM (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and 100 μg/ml penicillin/streptomycin (standard cell culture medium). dNC-PCs were cultivated in DMEM (Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented ...

Background : Evaluation of implant-materials as ce...

Background While bone substitute materials are routinely used, especially vertical bone, augmentation of the jaws is still a problematic step. Dental stem cells in combination with bone substitute materials may accelerate the augmentation of alveolar bone and perhaps, stem cell-based therapies can become an alternative to autologous, allogenic, or synthetic bone transplants and substitutes. How...

Evaluation of implant-materials as cell carriers f...

Abstract Background Dental stem cells in combination with implant materials may become an alternative to autologous bone transplants. For tissue engineering different types of soft and rigid implant materials are available, but little is known about the viability and the osteogenic differentiation of dental stem cells on these different types of materials. According to previous s...