Introduction : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [3]
Collar length is the distance between the implant platform and the gingival margin. Sometimes, significant vertical space that has not been corrected with vertical ridge augmentation may necessitate selection of longer abutments, which would lead to an increased vertical cantilever. Furthermore, selection of the length of abutment collar would be affected if different distances between the implant platform and the gingival margin exist. Despite consistent occlusogingivial dimension, the thickness of soft tissue around the abutment affects abutment collar length selection. Therefore, in posterior regions where reduction of surrounding soft tissues thickness does not interfere with esthetic results, this reduction may be beneficial from a biomechanical point of view [9]. Selection of the suitable abutment collar length from a prosthetic/esthetic point of view is influenced by the length of the implant collar used. Abutment collar length is determined based on the height of the emergence profile and prosthetic restoration type (cemented, screw-retained, or overdenture) [16].
Abutment selection according to collar length index is a critical mechanical factor; selection of longer abutments leads to an increased vertical cantilever which acts as a force magnifier [8]. Vertical cantilever designs increase forces on screws due to the lever effect and, therefore, should be avoided [17, 18]. Although increased restorative vertical space with longer collar length could play a role in screw loosening, there is no certain evidence that increase in abutment collar length can affect screw loosening. However, considering the abutment height from implant platform to the top of abutment (including abutment collar), an increase in the collar length might result in an increase in the vertical cantilever. To reduce the possibility of screw loosening, reducing the cantilever length has been recommended [9].
The application of dynamic cyclic loading is used to simulate masticatory function mimic oral cavity that might lead to a failure of implant–abutment connection. Also, it is a reliable method to test the effect of mechanical fatigue on the implant–abutment stability [4].
Serial posts:
- Abstract : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading
- Introduction : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [1]
- Introduction : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [2]
- Introduction : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [3]
- Introduction : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [4]
- Materials and methods : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [1]
- Materials and methods : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [2]
- Materials and methods : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [3]
- Results : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading
- Discussion : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [1]
- Discussion : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [2]
- Discussion : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [3]
- Discussion : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [4]
- Conclusions : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading
- References : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [1]
- References : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [2]
- References : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [3]
- Acknowledgements : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading
- Author information : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading
- Ethics declarations : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading
- Rights and permissions : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading
- About this article : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading
- Table 1 One-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test results for mean ± SD of the %initial RTL, %postload RTL, and %difference between initial and postload RTL between all groups (Of: Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant)
- Table 2 One-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test results for mean ± SD of the initial RTV, postload RTV, and difference between initial and postload RTV between all groups (Of: Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant)
- Table 3 Comparison between short and high collar length (A and B) (Of: Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant)
- Table 4 The raw data in all six experimental groups (Of: Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant)
- Fig. 1. Different abutment angulations and collar lengths : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant
- Fig. 2. a Stainless steel split cylindrical mold with implant fixture screwed to abutment. b Implant fixture unscrewed from abutment after polymerization. c Implant fixture centralized vertically and perpendicular to the base with platform flushed with resin block level : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant
- Fig. 3. 3D scanning for abutment and designing for metal tube : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant
- Fig. 4. Application of cyclic loading with universal testing machine : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant
- Fig. 5. Mean rate ± SD of removal torque loss (%) between groups and results of ANOVA test for loss ratio of removal torque value between groups : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant
- Fig. 6. Comparison between short and high collar length (A and B) : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant