Open hour:
senin - sabtu 09:00:00 - 20:00:00; minggu & tanggal merah tutup
doctordentist_palmerah_jakarta@implantgigi.com
+62 21 5365 4792
doctor+dentist Jakarta
home
insight
help
Login
Register
Table 4 The raw data in all six experimental groups (Of: Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant)
Table 4 The raw data in all six experimental groups (Of: Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant)
author: Mai Ahmed Yousry El-Sheikh, Tamer Mohamed Nasr Mostafa, Mohamed Maamoun El-Sheikh
|
publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
N
Groups
Subgroups
Initial RTV
Postload RTV
Initial RTL
Postload RTL
% of change RTV
% of change RTL
1
GI
A
23
24.1
23.33
19.67
− 4.78
15.69
2
GI
A
22.4
23.04
25.33
23.2
− 2.86
8.41
3
GI
A
22.3
22.9
25.67
23.67
− 2.69
7.79
4
GI
A
21.8
21.5
27.33
28.33
1.38
− 3.66
5
GI
A
23
24.2
23.33
19.33
− 5.22
17.15
6
GI
A
22.1
22.8
26.33
24
− 3.17
8.85
7
GI
A
22.8
23.15
24
22.83
− 1.54
4.88
8
GI
A
22.9
24
23.67
20
− 4.8
15.5
9
GI
A
22.2
22.9
26
23.67
− 3.15
8.96
#
GI
A
22
21.6
26.67
28
1.82
− 4.99
#
GI
A
21.9
22.4
27
25.33
− 2.28
6.19
#
GI
A
22
22.8
26.67
24
− 3.64
10.01
#
GI
A
22.8
23.2
24
22.67
− 1.75
5.54
#
GI
A
22.9
23.9
23.67
20.33
− 4.37
14.11
#
GI
A
23.5
24.5
21.67
18.33
− 4.26
15.41
#
GI
B
23
23.1
23.33
23
− 0.43
1.41
#
GI
B
22.9
23
23.67
23.33
− 0.44
1.44
#
GI
B
22.5
22.7
25
24.33
− 0.89
2.68
#
GI
B
22.4
22.5
25.33
25
− 0.45
1.3
#
GI
B
21.8
22.4
27.33
25.33
− 2.75
7.32
#
GI
B
23
23.1
23.33
23
− 0.43
1.41
#
GI
B
22.8
23
24
23.33
− 0.88
2.79
#
GI
B
22.5
22.7
25
24.33
− 0.89
2.68
#
GI
B
22.7
22.9
24.33
23.67
− 0.88
2.71
#
GI
B
22.8
23.2
24
22.67
− 1.75
5.54
#
GI
B
21.4
21.5
28.67
28.33
− 0.47
1.19
#
GI
B
22.1
22.8
26.33
24
− 3.17
8.85
#
GI
B
22.2
22.97
26
23.43
− 3.47
9.88
#
GI
B
22.5
22.6
25
24.67
− 0.44
1.32
#
GI
B
22.3
22.8
25.67
24
− 2.24
6.51
#
GII
A
22.9
21.4
23.67
28.67
6.55
− 21.12
#
GII
A
22.5
20.9
25
30.33
7.11
− 21.32
#
GII
A
22.4
20.8
25.33
30.67
7.14
− 21.08
#
GII
A
22.1
20.6
26.33
31.33
6.79
− 18.99
#
GII
A
21.9
19.9
27
33.67
9.13
− 24.7
#
GII
A
23
21.5
23.33
28.33
6.52
− 21.43
#
GII
A
22.6
21
24.67
30
7.08
− 21.61
#
GII
A
22.4
20.8
25.33
30.67
7.14
− 21.08
#
GII
A
22
20.5
26.67
31.67
6.82
− 18.75
#
GII
A
22.3
20.7
25.67
31
7.17
− 20.76
#
GII
A
21.8
19.8
27.33
34
9.17
− 24.41
#
GII
A
22.8
21.1
24
29.67
7.46
− 23.63
#
GII
A
22.7
21
24.33
30
7.49
− 23.3
#
GII
A
22.2
20.6
26
31.33
7.21
− 20.5
#
GII
A
23.1
21.5
23
28.33
6.93
− 23.17
#
GII
B
22.8
20.4
24
32
10.53
− 33.33
#
GII
B
22.1
19.2
26.33
36
13.12
− 36.73
#
GII
B
22
18.7
26.67
37.67
15
− 41.24
#
GII
B
21.8
17.8
27.33
40.67
18.35
− 48.81
#
GII
B
22.7
20.1
24.33
33
11.45
− 35.64
#
GII
B
22.1
18.9
26.33
37
14.48
− 40.52
#
GII
B
22.9
20.4
23.67
32
10.92
− 35.19
#
GII
B
22.2
19.4
26
35.33
12.61
− 35.88
#
GII
B
21.5
17.7
28.33
41
17.67
− 44.72
#
GII
B
21.6
17.8
28
40.67
17.59
− 45.25
#
GII
B
22.7
19.5
24.33
35
14.1
− 43.86
#
GII
B
21.9
18.5
27
38.33
15.53
− 41.96
#
GII
B
22.8
20.3
24
32.33
10.96
− 34.71
#
GII
B
22.3
19.5
25.67
35
12.56
− 36.35
#
GII
B
22
18.8
26.67
37.33
14.55
− 39.97
#
GIII
A
22.6
20.1
24.67
33
11.06
− 33.77
#
GIII
A
22.4
19.2
25.33
36
14.29
− 42.12
#
GIII
A
22.3
19.1
25.67
36.33
14.35
− 41.53
#
GIII
A
21.9
17.7
27
41
19.18
− 51.85
#
GIII
A
21.9
17.9
27
40.33
18.26
− 49.37
#
GIII
A
22.5
19.3
25
35.67
14.22
− 42.68
#
GIII
A
22.3
19
25.67
36.67
14.8
− 42.85
#
GIII
A
22.7
20.2
24.33
32.67
11.01
− 34.28
#
GIII
A
21.8
17.8
27.33
40.67
18.35
− 48.81
#
GIII
A
21.8
17.8
27.33
40.67
18.35
− 48.81
#
GIII
A
22
18.1
26.67
39.67
17.73
− 48.74
#
GIII
A
22.2
18.6
26
38
16.22
− 46.15
#
GIII
A
22.6
20.1
24.67
33
11.06
− 33.77
#
GIII
A
22.2
18.3
26
39
17.57
− 50
#
GIII
A
22.1
18.2
26.33
39.33
17.65
− 49.37
#
GIII
B
22.7
18.8
24.33
37.33
17.18
− 53.43
#
GIII
B
22
17
26.67
43.33
22.73
− 62.47
#
GIII
B
22
16.9
26.67
43.67
23.18
− 63.74
#
GIII
B
21.9
15.7
27
47.67
28.31
− 76.56
#
GIII
B
21.8
15.8
27.33
47.33
27.52
− 73.18
#
GIII
B
22.6
18.7
24.67
37.67
17.26
− 52.7
#
GIII
B
22.1
18.2
26.33
Abstract : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading
Introduction : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [1]
Introduction : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [2]
Introduction : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [3]
Introduction : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [4]
Materials and methods : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [1]
Materials and methods : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [2]
Materials and methods : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [3]
Results : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading
Discussion : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [1]
Discussion : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [2]
Discussion : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [3]
Discussion : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [4]
Conclusions : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading
References : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [1]
References : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [2]
References : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [3]
Acknowledgements : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading
Author information : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading
Ethics declarations : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading
Rights and permissions : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading
About this article : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading
Table 1 One-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test results for mean ± SD of the %initial RTL, %postload RTL, and %difference between initial and postload RTL between all groups (Of: Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant)
Table 2 One-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test results for mean ± SD of the initial RTV, postload RTV, and difference between initial and postload RTV between all groups (Of: Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant)
Table 3 Comparison between short and high collar length (A and B) (Of: Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant)
Table 4 The raw data in all six experimental groups (Of: Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant)
Fig. 1. Different abutment angulations and collar lengths : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant
Fig. 2. a Stainless steel split cylindrical mold with implant fixture screwed to abutment. b Implant fixture unscrewed from abutment after polymerization. c Implant fixture centralized vertically and perpendicular to the base with platform flushed with resin block level : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant
Fig. 3. 3D scanning for abutment and designing for metal tube : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant
Fig. 4. Application of cyclic loading with universal testing machine : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant
Fig. 5. Mean rate ± SD of removal torque loss (%) between groups and results of ANOVA test for loss ratio of removal torque value between groups : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant
Fig. 6. Comparison between short and high collar length (A and B) : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant
id post:
New thoughts
Me:
id post
submit
search
glossary
en
in