References : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [1]
Prado CJ, Neves FD, Soares CJ, Dantas KA, Dantas TS, Naves LZ. Influence of abutment screw design and surface coating on the bending flexural strength of the implant set. J Oral Implantol. 2014;40:123–8.
Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JY. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;90:121–32.
Michalakis KX, Calvani PL, Muftu S, Pissiotis A, Hirayama H. The effect of different implant-abutment connections on screw joint stability. J Oral Implantol. 2014;40:146–52.
Asvanund P, Cheepsathit L. Effect of different angulation angled abutment on screw loosening of implants under cyclic loading. M Dent J. 2016;36:337–24.
Ferreira MB, Delben JA, Barao VA, Faverani LP, Dos Santos PH, Assuncao WG. Evaluation of torque maintenance of abutment and cylinder screws with Morse taper implants. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23:631–4.
Geckili E, Geckili O, Bilhan H, Kutay O, Bilgin T. Clinical comparison of screw-retained and screwless Morse taper implant-abutment connections: one-year postloading results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017;32:1123–31.
Schwarz MS. Mechanical complications of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11:156–8.
Misch CE. Principles for abutment and prosthetic screws and screw-retained components and prostheses. In: Elsevier Mosby. 2nd ed; 2015. p. 724–52.
Siadat H, Pirmoazen S, Beyabanaki E, Alikhasi M. Does abutment collar length affect abutment screw loosening after cyclic loading? J Oral Implantol. 2015;41:346–51.
Delben JA, Gomes EA, Barao VA, Assuncao WG. Evaluation of the effect of retightening and mechanical cycling on preload maintenance of retention screws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011;26:251–6.
Cho WR, Huh YH, Park CJ, Cho LR. Effect of cyclic loading and retightening on reverse torque value in external and internal implants. J Adv Prosthodont. 2015;7:288–93.
Eger DE, Gunsolley JC, Feldman S. Comparison of angled and standard abutments and their effect on clinical outcomes: a preliminary report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15:819–23.
Antoun H, Belmon P, Cherfane P, Sitbon JM. Immediate loading of four or six implants in completely edentulous patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2012;32:1–9.
Serial posts:
- Abstract : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading
- Introduction : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [1]
- Introduction : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [2]
- Introduction : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [3]
- Introduction : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [4]
- Materials and methods : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [1]
- Materials and methods : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [2]
- Materials and methods : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [3]
- Results : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading
- Discussion : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [1]
- Discussion : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [2]
- Discussion : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [3]
- Discussion : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [4]
- Conclusions : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading
- References : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [1]
- References : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [2]
- References : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [3]
- Acknowledgements : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading
- Author information : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading
- Ethics declarations : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading
- Rights and permissions : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading
- About this article : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading
- Table 1 One-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test results for mean ± SD of the %initial RTL, %postload RTL, and %difference between initial and postload RTL between all groups (Of: Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant)
- Table 2 One-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test results for mean ± SD of the initial RTV, postload RTV, and difference between initial and postload RTV between all groups (Of: Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant)
- Table 3 Comparison between short and high collar length (A and B) (Of: Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant)
- Table 4 The raw data in all six experimental groups (Of: Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant)
- Fig. 1. Different abutment angulations and collar lengths : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant
- Fig. 2. a Stainless steel split cylindrical mold with implant fixture screwed to abutment. b Implant fixture unscrewed from abutment after polymerization. c Implant fixture centralized vertically and perpendicular to the base with platform flushed with resin block level : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant
- Fig. 3. 3D scanning for abutment and designing for metal tube : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant
- Fig. 4. Application of cyclic loading with universal testing machine : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant
- Fig. 5. Mean rate ± SD of removal torque loss (%) between groups and results of ANOVA test for loss ratio of removal torque value between groups : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant
- Fig. 6. Comparison between short and high collar length (A and B) : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant