References : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [2]
Cavallaro JG, Greenstein G. Angled implant abutments. A Practical Application of Available Knowledge J Am Dent Assoc. 2011;142:150–8.
Kallus T, Henry P, Jemt T, Jorneus L. Clinical evaluation of angulated abutments for the Branemark system: a pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990;5:39–45.
Herrero-Climent M, Romero-Ruiz MM, Diaz-Castro CM, Bullon P, Rios-Santos JV. Influence of two different machined-collar heights on crestal bone loss. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29:1374–9.
Stuker RA, Teixeira ER, Beck JP, Costa NP. Preload and torque removal evaluation of three different abutment screws for single standing implant restorations. J Appl Oral Sci. 2008;15:55–8.
Kim NG, Kim YS, Kim CW, Jang KS, Lim YJ. The effect of abutment height on screw loosening in single implant-supported prothesis after dynamic cyclic loading. J Korean Acad Prosthodont. 2004;42:664–70.
Sethi A, Kaus T, Sochor P. The use of angulated abutments in implant dentistry: five-year clinical results of an ongoing prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15:801–10.
Tonella BP, Pellizzer EP, Ferraco R, Falcon-Antenucci RM, Carvalho PS, Goiato MC. Photoelastic analysis of cemented or screwed implant-supported prostheses with different prosthetic connections. J Oral Implantol. 2011;37:401–10.
Akca K, Cehreli MC, Iplikcioglu H. Evaluation of the mechanical characteristics of the implant abutment complex of a reduced-diameter Morsetaper implant. A nonlinear finite element stress analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003;14:444–54.
Bozkaya D, Muftu S. Mechanics of the tapered interference fit in dental implants. J Biomech. 2003;36:1649–58.
Pardal-Pelaez B, Montero J. Preload loss of abutment screws after dynamic fatigue in single implant-supported restorations. A systematic review. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9:1355–61.
Mohammed HH, Lee JH, Bae JM, Cho HW. Effect of abutment screw length and cyclic loading on removal torque in external and internal hex implants. J Adv Prosthodont. 2016;8:62–9.
Shin HM, Huh JB, Yun MJ, Jeon YC, Chang BM, Jeong CM. Influence of the implant-abutment connection design and diameter on the screw joint stability. J Adv Prosthodont. 2014;6:126–32.
Serial posts:
- Abstract : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading
- Introduction : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [1]
- Introduction : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [2]
- Introduction : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [3]
- Introduction : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [4]
- Materials and methods : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [1]
- Materials and methods : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [2]
- Materials and methods : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [3]
- Results : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading
- Discussion : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [1]
- Discussion : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [2]
- Discussion : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [3]
- Discussion : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [4]
- Conclusions : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading
- References : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [1]
- References : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [2]
- References : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading [3]
- Acknowledgements : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading
- Author information : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading
- Ethics declarations : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading
- Rights and permissions : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading
- About this article : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading
- Table 1 One-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test results for mean ± SD of the %initial RTL, %postload RTL, and %difference between initial and postload RTL between all groups (Of: Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant)
- Table 2 One-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test results for mean ± SD of the initial RTV, postload RTV, and difference between initial and postload RTV between all groups (Of: Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant)
- Table 3 Comparison between short and high collar length (A and B) (Of: Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant)
- Table 4 The raw data in all six experimental groups (Of: Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant)
- Fig. 1. Different abutment angulations and collar lengths : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant
- Fig. 2. a Stainless steel split cylindrical mold with implant fixture screwed to abutment. b Implant fixture unscrewed from abutment after polymerization. c Implant fixture centralized vertically and perpendicular to the base with platform flushed with resin block level : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant
- Fig. 3. 3D scanning for abutment and designing for metal tube : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant
- Fig. 4. Application of cyclic loading with universal testing machine : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant
- Fig. 5. Mean rate ± SD of removal torque loss (%) between groups and results of ANOVA test for loss ratio of removal torque value between groups : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant
- Fig. 6. Comparison between short and high collar length (A and B) : Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant