References : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats? [1]
Grand View Research, Dental implants market size, share & trends analysis report by product (titanium implants, zirconium implants), by region (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, MEA), and segment forecasts, 2018 – 2024. 2018.
Eke PI, Dye B, Wei L, Thornton-Evans G, Genco R. Prevalence of periodontitis in adults in the United States: 2009 and 2010. J Dent Res. 2012;91:914–20.
Mombelli A, Müller N, Cionca N. The epidemiology of peri-implantitis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23:67–76.
Karoussis IK, Salvi GE, Heitz-Mayfield LJ, Brägger U, Hämmerle CH, Lang NP. Long-term implant prognosis in patients with and without a history of chronic periodontitis: a 10-year prospective cohort study of the ITI® Dental Implant System. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003;14:329–39.
Heitz-Mayfield LJ, Lang NP. Comparative biology of chronic and aggressive periodontitis vs. peri-implantitis. Periodontol 2000. 2010;53:167–81.
Pjetursson BE, Helbling C, Weber HP, Matuliene G, Salvi GE, Brägger U, et al. Peri-implantitis susceptibility as it relates to periodontal therapy and supportive care. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23:888–94.
Rutar A, Lang NP, Buser D, Bürgin W, Mombelli A. Retrospective assessment of clinical and microbiological factors affecting periimplant tissue conditions. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12:189–95.
Wancket L. Animal models for evaluation of bone implants and devices: comparative bone structure and common model uses. Vet Pathol. 2015;52:842–50.
Wang F, Y-l S, D-h L, C-x L, Wang Y, Zhang N, et al. Type 2 diabetes mellitus impairs bone healing of dental implants in GK rats. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010;88:e7–9.
Nemţoi A, Trandafir V, Paşca A-S, Şindilar E-V, Drăgan E, Odri G-A, et al. Osseointegration of chemically modified sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implant surface in diabetic rats: a histological and scanning electron microscopy study. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2017;58:881–6.
Sugita Y, Honda Y, Kato I, Kubo K, Maeda H, Ogawa T. Role of photofunctionalization in mitigating impaired osseointegration associated with type 2 diabetes in rats. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29:1293–300.
Serial posts:
- Abstract : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats?
- Highlights : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats?
- Background : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats? [1]
- Background : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats? [2]
- Materials and methods : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats? [1]
- Materials and methods : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats? [2]
- Results : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats?
- Discussion : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats? [1]
- Discussion : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats? [2]
- Discussion : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats? [3]
- Conclusion : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats?
- Availability of data and materials : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats?
- References : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats? [1]
- References : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats? [2]
- References : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats? [3]
- References : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats? [4]
- Acknowledgements : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats?
- Funding : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats?
- Author information : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats? [1]
- Author information : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats? [2]
- Ethics declarations : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats?
- Additional information : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats?
- Rights and permissions : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats?
- About this article : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats?
- Table 1 Rat body weight during the experiment : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats?
- Fig. 1. a) Time course of the experiment. b) Curve of the rat body weight change. c) Implant survival after 7 weeks of implantation. Implant success and failure rate is analyzed by using Clopper-Pearson’s exact method at 95% confidence interval. Our experiment data indicate that the true success rate of implantation in maxillary natural diastema in rat is less than 38.4% at a confident level of 95% : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implant
- Fig. 2. Implantation of two implants at maxillary diastemata per rat. a Surgery implantation. b X-ray periapical picture after surgery. c Seven weeks after implantion : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implant
- Fig. 3. a–c Micro-CT frontal planes indicate the location of implant. d, e Micro-CT sagittal plane. f, g Micro-CT transverse plane. h Micro-CT 3D constructed image indicates osseointegration around the implant fixture : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implant
- Fig. 4. Micro-CT images indicate maxillary fist molar site will be able to provide a substantial cancellous bone to support a dental implant. a Sagittal plane. b Frontal plane : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implant