References : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats? [3]
Gutwald R, Haberstroh J, Stricker A, Rüther E, Otto F, Xavier SP, et al. Influence of rhBMP-2 on bone formation and osseointegration in different implant systems after sinus-floor elevation. An in vivo study on sheep. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2010;38:571–9.
Assenza B, Scarano A, Perrotti V, Vozza I, Quaranta A, Quaranta M, et al. Peri-implant bone reactions around immediately loaded conical implants with different prosthetic suprastructures: histological and histomorphometrical study on minipigs. Clin Oral Investig. 2010;14:285–90.
Farronato D, Santoro G, Canullo L, Botticelli D, Maiorana C, Lang NP. Establishment of the epithelial attachment and connective tissue adaptation to implants installed under the concept of “platform switching”: a histologic study in minipigs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23:90–4.
Alexander F, Christian U, Stefan T, Christoph V, Georg W. Long-term effects of magnetron-sputtered calcium phosphate coating on osseointegration of dental implants in non-human primates. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:183–8.
Wikesjö UM, Qahash M, Polimeni G, Susin C, Shanaman RH, Rohrer MD, et al. Alveolar ridge augmentation using implants coated with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2: histologic observations. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35:1001–10.
Bressan E, Sivolella S, Urrutia ZA, Salata LA, Lang NP, Botticelli D. Short implants (6 mm) installed immediately into extraction sockets: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23:536–41.
Mainetti T, Lang NP, Bengazi F, Favero V, Soto Cantero L, Botticelli D. Sequential healing at implants installed immediately into extraction sockets. An experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27:130–8.
Biguetti CC, Cavalla F, Silveira EM, Fonseca AC, Vieira AE, Tabanez AP, et al. Oral implant osseointegration model in C57Bl/6 mice: microtomographic, histological, histomorphometric and molecular characterization. J Appl Oral Sci. 2018;26.
Koutouzis T, Eastman C, Chukkapalli S, Larjava H, Kesavalu L. A novel rat model of polymicrobial peri-implantitis: a preliminary study. J Periodontol. 2017;88:e32–41.
Du Z, Xiao Y, Hashimi S, Hamlet SM, Ivanovski S. The effects of implant topography on osseointegration under estrogen deficiency induced osteoporotic conditions: histomorphometric, transcriptional and ultrastructural analysis. Acta Biomaterialia. 2016;42:351–63.
Serial posts:
- Abstract : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats?
- Highlights : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats?
- Background : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats? [1]
- Background : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats? [2]
- Materials and methods : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats? [1]
- Materials and methods : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats? [2]
- Results : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats?
- Discussion : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats? [1]
- Discussion : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats? [2]
- Discussion : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats? [3]
- Conclusion : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats?
- Availability of data and materials : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats?
- References : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats? [1]
- References : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats? [2]
- References : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats? [3]
- References : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats? [4]
- Acknowledgements : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats?
- Funding : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats?
- Author information : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats? [1]
- Author information : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats? [2]
- Ethics declarations : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats?
- Additional information : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats?
- Rights and permissions : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats?
- About this article : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats?
- Table 1 Rat body weight during the experiment : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats?
- Fig. 1. a) Time course of the experiment. b) Curve of the rat body weight change. c) Implant survival after 7 weeks of implantation. Implant success and failure rate is analyzed by using Clopper-Pearson’s exact method at 95% confidence interval. Our experiment data indicate that the true success rate of implantation in maxillary natural diastema in rat is less than 38.4% at a confident level of 95% : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implant
- Fig. 2. Implantation of two implants at maxillary diastemata per rat. a Surgery implantation. b X-ray periapical picture after surgery. c Seven weeks after implantion : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implant
- Fig. 3. a–c Micro-CT frontal planes indicate the location of implant. d, e Micro-CT sagittal plane. f, g Micro-CT transverse plane. h Micro-CT 3D constructed image indicates osseointegration around the implant fixture : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implant
- Fig. 4. Micro-CT images indicate maxillary fist molar site will be able to provide a substantial cancellous bone to support a dental implant. a Sagittal plane. b Frontal plane : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implant