References : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats? [2]
Casap N, Nimri S, Ziv E, Sela J, Samuni Y. Type 2 diabetes has minimal effect on osseointegration of titanium implants in Psammomys obesus. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:458–64.
Hashiguchi C, Kawamoto S-I, Kasai T, Nishi Y, Nagaoka E. Influence of an antidiabetic drug on biomechanical and histological parameters around implants in type 2 diabetic rats. Implant Dent. 2014;23:264–9.
Lioubavina-Hack N, Lang NP, Karring T. Significance of primary stability for osseointegration of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17:244–50.
Freire MO, Sedghizadeh PP, Schaudinn C, Gorur A, Downey JS, Choi JH, et al. Development of an animal model for Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans biofilm-mediated oral osteolytic infection: a preliminary study. J Periodontol. 2011;82:778–89.
Lu L, Liu Y, Zhang X, Lin J. The therapeutic role of bone marrow stem cells local injection in rat experimental periodontitis. J Oral Rehabil. 2019.
Suh JS, Kim S, Boström KI, Wang C-Y, Kim RH, Park N-H. Periodontitis-induced systemic inflammation exacerbates atherosclerosis partly via endothelial–mesenchymal transition in mice. Int J Oral Sci. 2019;11:21.
Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Sekino S, Lindhe J. Tissue reactions to abutment shift: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003;5:82–8.
Abrahamsson I, Linder E, Lang NP. Implant stability in relation to osseointegration: an experimental study in the Labrador dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:313–8.
Canullo L, Tallarico M, Botticelli D, Alccayhuaman KAA, Martins Neto EC, Xavier SP. Hard and soft tissue changes around implants activated using plasma of argon: a histomorphometric study in dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29:389–95.
Wikesjö UM, Huang YH, Xiropaidis AV, Sorensen RG, Rohrer MD, Prasad HS, et al. Bone formation at recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2-coated titanium implants in the posterior maxilla (type IV bone) in non-human primates. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35:992–1000.
Alayan J, Vaquette C, Saifzadeh S, Hutmacher D, Ivanovski S. Comparison of early osseointegration of SLA® and SLActive® implants in maxillary sinus augmentation: a pilot study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28:1325–33.
Serial posts:
- Abstract : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats?
- Highlights : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats?
- Background : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats? [1]
- Background : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats? [2]
- Materials and methods : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats? [1]
- Materials and methods : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats? [2]
- Results : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats?
- Discussion : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats? [1]
- Discussion : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats? [2]
- Discussion : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats? [3]
- Conclusion : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats?
- Availability of data and materials : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats?
- References : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats? [1]
- References : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats? [2]
- References : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats? [3]
- References : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats? [4]
- Acknowledgements : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats?
- Funding : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats?
- Author information : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats? [1]
- Author information : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats? [2]
- Ethics declarations : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats?
- Additional information : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats?
- Rights and permissions : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats?
- About this article : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats?
- Table 1 Rat body weight during the experiment : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats?
- Fig. 1. a) Time course of the experiment. b) Curve of the rat body weight change. c) Implant survival after 7 weeks of implantation. Implant success and failure rate is analyzed by using Clopper-Pearson’s exact method at 95% confidence interval. Our experiment data indicate that the true success rate of implantation in maxillary natural diastema in rat is less than 38.4% at a confident level of 95% : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implant
- Fig. 2. Implantation of two implants at maxillary diastemata per rat. a Surgery implantation. b X-ray periapical picture after surgery. c Seven weeks after implantion : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implant
- Fig. 3. a–c Micro-CT frontal planes indicate the location of implant. d, e Micro-CT sagittal plane. f, g Micro-CT transverse plane. h Micro-CT 3D constructed image indicates osseointegration around the implant fixture : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implant
- Fig. 4. Micro-CT images indicate maxillary fist molar site will be able to provide a substantial cancellous bone to support a dental implant. a Sagittal plane. b Frontal plane : Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implant