Table 1 Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Table 1 Inclusion and exclusion criteria
author: Choknapa Tirachaimongkol,Peraphan Pothacharoen,Peter A Reichart, Pathawee Khongkhunthian | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patients aged 25–65 years
Presence of periodontal disease or periapical lesions
Ability to participate in this study
History of bone augmentation at the implant site in the past 6 months
No systemic diseases (e.g., diabetes, osteoporosis, hypertension, etc.)
History of tooth extraction at the implant site in the past 6 months
Nonsmokers
A need for submersion of an implant
No contraindication for minor oral surgery
Requirement for grafting of bone or soft tissue at the time of implant insertion
No psychosis or psychiatric disorders
Pregnancy or positive to pregnancy test
No uncontrolled bleeding disorders
Postmenopausal women
No bisphosphonate, hormone replacement, or corticosteroid drug use
Physical disorders which would interfere with the ability to maintain oral health care
No anti-inflammatory drug use for 6 months before surgery
Never received radiotherapy of the head and neck region
Adequate oral hygiene (average modified sulcus bleeding index ≤1, average modified plaque index ≤1)
Adequate bone volume to achieve the plan without other surgery (bone height ≥12 mm, bone width ≥7 mm)
Existing healthy contralateral posterior mandibular tooth
Serial posts:
-
Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers
-
Background : Relation between the stability of dental implants (1)
-
Background : Relation between the stability of dental implants (2)
-
Methods : Relation between the stability of dental implants (1)
-
Methods : Relation between the stability of dental implants (2)
-
Methods : Relation between the stability of dental implants (3)
-
Methods : Relation between the stability of dental implants (4)
-
Results : Relation between the stability of dental implants
-
Discussion : Relation between the stability of dental implants (1)
-
Discussion : Relation between the stability of dental implants (2)
-
Discussion : Relation between the stability of dental implants (3)
-
Reference : Relation between the stability of dental implants
-
Table 1 Inclusion and exclusion criteria
-
Table 2 Profile of patients
-
Table 3 ISQ values according to gender and bone quality
-
Table 4 Crevicular fluid volume
-
Table 5 Crevicular fluid ALP and OC levels
-
Figure 1. Timeline of the clinical study
-
Figure 2. Change in the mean ISQ values over time
-
Figure 3. Change in the median values
-
Figure 4. Change in the median values of the ALP level over time
-
Figure 5. Change in the median values of the OC level over time
-
Figure 6. There were weakly significant and positive correlations
-
Figure 7. Comparison between biomarker levels & ISQ values
-
Figure 8. There were moderately significant and positive correlations
| Inclusion criteria | Exclusion criteria |
|---|---|
| Patients aged 25–65 years | Presence of periodontal disease or periapical lesions |
| Ability to participate in this study | History of bone augmentation at the implant site in the past 6 months |
| No systemic diseases (e.g., diabetes, osteoporosis, hypertension, etc.) | History of tooth extraction at the implant site in the past 6 months |
| Nonsmokers | A need for submersion of an implant |
| No contraindication for minor oral surgery | Requirement for grafting of bone or soft tissue at the time of implant insertion |
| No psychosis or psychiatric disorders | Pregnancy or positive to pregnancy test |
| No uncontrolled bleeding disorders | Postmenopausal women |
| No bisphosphonate, hormone replacement, or corticosteroid drug use | Physical disorders which would interfere with the ability to maintain oral health care |
| No anti-inflammatory drug use for 6 months before surgery | |
| Never received radiotherapy of the head and neck region | |
| Adequate oral hygiene (average modified sulcus bleeding index ≤1, average modified plaque index ≤1) | |
| Adequate bone volume to achieve the plan without other surgery (bone height ≥12 mm, bone width ≥7 mm) | |
| Existing healthy contralateral posterior mandibular tooth |
- Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers
- Background : Relation between the stability of dental implants (1)
- Background : Relation between the stability of dental implants (2)
- Methods : Relation between the stability of dental implants (1)
- Methods : Relation between the stability of dental implants (2)
- Methods : Relation between the stability of dental implants (3)
- Methods : Relation between the stability of dental implants (4)
- Results : Relation between the stability of dental implants
- Discussion : Relation between the stability of dental implants (1)
- Discussion : Relation between the stability of dental implants (2)
- Discussion : Relation between the stability of dental implants (3)
- Reference : Relation between the stability of dental implants
- Table 1 Inclusion and exclusion criteria
- Table 2 Profile of patients
- Table 3 ISQ values according to gender and bone quality
- Table 4 Crevicular fluid volume
- Table 5 Crevicular fluid ALP and OC levels
- Figure 1. Timeline of the clinical study
- Figure 2. Change in the mean ISQ values over time
- Figure 3. Change in the median values
- Figure 4. Change in the median values of the ALP level over time
- Figure 5. Change in the median values of the OC level over time
- Figure 6. There were weakly significant and positive correlations
- Figure 7. Comparison between biomarker levels & ISQ values
- Figure 8. There were moderately significant and positive correlations